[Discussioni] uso improprio dellalicenza?

[Paolo Pedaletti]

ciao
ho un dubbio:
abstract:
un software sotto gpl2 puo' non essere liberamente (e anonimamente) 
accessible?

esempio:
------------------------------------------
Moodle Connector:
http://questionmark.com/perception/help/v4/manuals/moodle/index.html
Like Moodle itself, the Moodle Connector is open-source software and is 
available from Questionmark at no charge.

The Moodle Connector is released under the terms of the GNU General 
Public License (GPL). For more information on the GNU GPL, please refer 
   to: www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt
------------------------------------------

quindi e' sotto gpl(2)

ma:
------------------------------------------
Downloading and installing the Moodle Connector zip file

The Moodle Connector zip file can be obtained by requesting a copy from 
Questionmark. Please contact Questionmark for more information.
------------------------------------------

cioe' e' gpl2 ma per ottenerlo devo iscrivermi al sito:
http://www.questionmark.com/us/download/index.aspx
Moodle Connector
http://www.questionmark.com/communities/index.aspx

In sintesi:
un software sotto gpl2 puo' non essere liberamente (e anonimamente) 
accessible?

Grazie.

-- 
Paolo Pedaletti
www.openlabs.it