[Diritto] Vovida Software License
Andrea Glorioso
diritto@softwarelibero.it
Mon, 12 May 2003 09:34:08 +0200
>>>>> "ag" == Andrea Glorioso <sama@perchetopi.org> writes:
ag> Ciao a tutti. Qualcuno potrebbe dare un'occhiata alla Vovida
ag> Software License:
ag> http://www.vovida.org/license.html
ag> e confermarmi che si tratta di una licenza libera? E` gia`
ag> stata certificata dall'OSI e ad una prima lettura mi pare che
ag> sia anche libera, ma mi piacerebbe avere conferma da qualche
ag> membro (della lista) esperto.
Ciao a tutti.
Ho parlato con gli GNU Licenser, e (come ipotizzava Simo) il punto 4
e` incompatibile con la GPL. FSF suggerisce, se si vuole utilizzare
codice GPL con Vovida, di aggiungere una clausola esplicita di
eccezione.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 08:53, Andrea Glorioso via RT wrote:
>
> >>>>> "l" == licensing <novalis@fsf.org> writes:
>
> l> Unfortunately, term 4 is incompatible with the GPL.
>
> Dear Dave,
>
> thank you for your answer. I had some doubt on point 4, and I still
> have, because I think that the obligation not to use the name VOCAL is
> just the normal protection of a trademark which has no influence
> whatsoever on the effective use of the program itself.
The problem is that the name "vocal" is very general, and if only a
small part of the program is used in a larger, unrelated program,
there's no trademark issue. So this is an extra restriction.
> BTW, the reason why I'm asking is because I (and the organization I'm
> working with) am planning to start a project which could make
> extensive use of the VOCAL software, but which would be licensed under
> the GNU GPL. Just for your information.
I recommend simply using a special exception for linking to VOCAL.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ciao,
andrea
--
Tutto e` efficacia e razionalita` andrea glorioso
Niente puo` stupire
E non e` certo il tempo quello www.emergency.it
Che ti invecchia e ti fa morire sama@perchetopi.org