[Discussioni] Re: gnuvox (era: Informazione pubblica: bene comune)

[Francesco Potorti`]

Nicola Grossi:
>Certo è che, a volte, fissarsi sui termini può far perdere di vista la 
>sostanza: l'attuale clausola anti-DRM della GPL v3, ad esempio, si intitola 
>"appropriatamente" "digital restrictions management", ma assomiglia più al 
>testo di una poesia che al testo di una licenza. Speriamo bene. 

Hmm.  A me sembra più il testo di una licenza.

 <http://gplv3.fsf.org/draft>


    3. Digital Restrictions Management.

As  a  free  software  license,  this  License  intrinsically  disfavors
technical attempts to restrict users' freedom to copy, modify, and share
copyrighted works. Each of its  provisions shall be interpreted in light
of this specific declaration of the licensor's intent. Regardless of any
other provision  of this License,  no permission is given  to distribute
covered works  that illegally  invade users' privacy,  nor for  modes of
distribution that deny users that run covered works the full exercise of
the legal rights granted by this License.

No  covered   work  constitutes  part  of   an  effective  technological
protection measure:  that is to say,  distribution of a  covered work as
part of a system to  generate or access certain data constitutes general
permission at  least for development,  distribution and use,  under this
License, of other software capable of accessing the same data.